Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowa_Flames_Fan
And I'll say again: this outcome is better. I'm not sure why you can't understand that a guilty verdict without the use of evidence that is of questionable admissibility is better than one that uses that evidence and gives the accused another argument on appeal for getting a new trial.
|
I never ever said anything about one verdict being better than the other. I know the judge didn't want this to come back on an appeal, I'm talking about this ruling saying that what's on a computer found in the course of a legal search warrant can't be used because the contents of the computer are now considered basically a residence. You can use the computer for evidence just not what's on it. I'm glad the jury got it right but again what if they got it wrong because they didn't know everything