Quote:
Originally Posted by HOOT
Ever think it was just the one guy doing it to make himself look better in his position within the organization? I am sure others knew about it, however you can not pin point their 3 superbowls on something like this. IMO the opposition should do a better job of hiding/changing their signals so they can't be videotaped or watched then its no one fault but their own.
|
What position would that be? You think the Pats woudn't wonder why a member of their organization was taping the opposing teams coaches (if they were totally innocent of this)? If the Pats were against this. How would this one individual use this information to his advantage within the organization? If he was a position coach or a co-ordinator he woud not have time during the game to tape the opposition. Sounds like this individuals sole responsabilty, during the game, was to tape the opposing teams coaches.
Plus it doesn't explain the allegations of putting microphones on the defensive lineman to record the offensive shifts and audibles at the line of scrimage. Looks like, if proven, this was an elaborate plan to gain an unfair advantage on the opposition.
If your a Pats fan I can understand why you woudn't want to believe it. I woudn't either. Much like Michael Vick fans must have a tough time dealing with his reality.