Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead
Athlete? Federer, no question.
Now as to who is more dominate in their sport (which seems to be the real question you are asking), I'd say Tiger simply because of the length of time he has been dominate.
|
But lets also face it...Tennis being a more physically demanding game should technically have a shorter period of dominance for any one individual. Afterall the human body does have a window of peak performance, and in a game like tennis where that physical abililty is tested quite severely I'd say it's a game where it's hard to dominate your peers for more than about 4 years. Tiger will dominate the tour for the next 10 years easily. If Federer can dominate the mens tennis field for another 3 that will be one hell of a feat.