It's a very interesting debate.
My vote is for Tiger - has to play against the field and because I think golf is so mentally taxing. There is so much time to think about the shots and so many variables to consider. Also, I think the fact that Tiger battles the gallery (size, cameras clicking, pressure) gives him the tougher challenge. We live in a very fortunate time for sports - witnessing the best golfer (Tiger), male Tennis player (Federer) and best baseball player (A-Rod) ever in their respective sports.
It's only an interesting debate because Tiger is in such good shape that he looks like an athlete when he's playing. The same comparison couldnt be made for Fudge, er, Phil Mickelson.
|