in response to the above 2 posts, per an article by Dan Barnes that ran in todays Herald apparently this judge
1. was the only one available on emergency basis
2. states that he often makes decisions that go against the Eskimos
have no idea whether there is data to support point 2
I agree he may well have made the decision most consistent with previous rulings (no clue whether that makes it right, but consistency is important) but the optics are bad
|