View Single Post
Old 08-28-2007, 05:11 PM   #12
FlameCity
Crash and Bang Winger
 
FlameCity's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

There was a story in the SUN about this at the start of August . . . LINK


Quote:
Well, it's time for a reality check. Five years ago, the Supreme Court of Canada decreed that a common-law union is not a marriage. It was a major news story at the time, but it bears repeating.


"To presume that common-law couples want to be bound by the same obligations as married couples is contrary to their choice to live in a common-law relationship," the court explained.


"If they have chosen not to marry, is it the state's task to impose a marriage-like regime on them retroactively?" the court asked pointedly.
Quote:
Because common-law partners and married couples are treated equally in some respects, such as for spousal and child payments and survivor benefits, she thought getting half the assets would be automatic.
FlameCity is offline   Reply With Quote