The CBC article posted by gottabekd says the same thing about the officers being identified because of their refusal to throw objects. I don't understand that.
Quote:
|
Police said the three were told to monitor protesters who were not peacefully demonstrating to prevent any violent incidents, but they were called out as undercover agents when they refused to throw objects.
|
To me that sounds as if the protestors were all throwing things and these three officers were singled out because they were the only ones who were not, which clearly isn't the case at all. In actuality it was the opposite, with the protestors demanding that an infiltrator put down the rock he was carrying while none of the protestors had any projectiles in hand and the protest leader was actually shielding the uniformed officers with his body.