Quote:
Originally Posted by worth
I agree with you to an extent. But there is still a burden of proof that needs to be presented.
don't see how the boot argument is relevant at all. why can't anarchists wear police boots? their readily avaliable to the public. all you have to do is go down to seals action gear off blackfoot trail or order a pair off the net.
it seems they do talk to the police, which is suspicious, i agree.
my opinions on the kind of country we live in would be kind of controvertial here i think and would probably get off topic...and I know it was a rethorical question so...lol
|
The boots is a superficial argument, behind a long line of real, substantial arguments. But if you've ever actually been to a protest and seen anarchists, you'll know they don't wear police issue boots. Ever. One doesn't like to paint an entire group with one brush, but police issue gear is something you generally do not associate with anarchists. Shaved heads/mowhawks, tattoos and doc martins, certainly, but not faux-hawks and the exact same type of boots the riot squad was wearing.
You don't always get the cordial response when you try and break through a police line with a weapon, either.