Quote:
Originally Posted by Flame On
I guess the question is whether you believe there's enough unprovable risk (what ever the cause/fault) to take steps that may mean unprovable risk to economies.
|
I don't think it takes much proof to look at a country's annual expenditure on things like Kyoto versus their reduction point in carbon emissions.
Money is being spent, and results are not being seen.
But other than that I agree, I'm certainly not in favour of doing nothing regardless of how much water the science holds. But pass the buck down to the consumers, the people with choices that put money back in the wheel.
Move up the light bulb ban, weight fees on garbage, Fotze's instant water value meter in your house ... these effect change. The macro stuff simply has not to this point.