View Single Post
Old 08-16-2007, 03:46 PM   #33
nmhen
Everybody's favourite Wild fan!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
This is a good summary, but you could always buy a deferred charge fund...the money will be sitting for 30 years anyway, so why pay the upfront fee? You will get the same management and same expertise, but also have your full initial investment.
Here's the thing with CDSCs in lieu of up-front loads.

With a share class where you pay the load, I'm getting paid right up front.

With a share class where you don't pay an up-front load, but there is a CDSC in place, I may never get paid (typically if you hold one of those share classes for long enough the CDSC expires).

Again, I am not running a charity. So I'm going to get paid one way or another in every situation.

The x-factor here is expenses. A fund charges shareholders essentially a management fee every year. But we are allowed to tier it differently for different share classes. So on the share classes where we get paid up front in the form of a load, we charge the smallest expense fees. But on the share classes where we don't charge an up-front load - even if there's a CDSC in place - we charge much higher expense fees.

To wit:

The Oppenheimer Global fund's A-share (up-front load, no CDSC) expense ratio is 1.08% The C-share's (no up-front load, CDSC in place) expense ratio is: 1.84%.

The 5-year average annual total return (as of 6/30/07) for the A-share is: 15.65%. For the C-share it is: 14.77%.

It may still be better for you than paying the load, but there is a misconception out there that deferred charge classes/funds are free.
nmhen is offline   Reply With Quote