Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss
I doubt that is true.
|
I'm wording this poorly.
The conclusion they probably came to is that the value loss from 2026 Kadri to 2027 Kadri would be greater than the value loss from 2026 Coleman to 2027 Coleman.
Meaning that, because of retention spots, if they had to pick one to deal with retention and one to hold onto, then the overall return for both of those assets would be greater if they held onto Coleman not Kadri.