Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta
The NYT article wasnt written by normal NYT lefties.
It was written by two individuals who have dubious records about the war. Heck KENNETH M. POLLACK actually gave reasons for the war before it happened.
Dont kid yourself, a left of centre newspaper isnt going to derial any Democratic Presidential victory. This is likely an op-ed piece written and printed so that the NYT can say they are unbiased. The only way the Reps save any face is if they produce Osama's head, no head, then the war is a failure.
Dont be fooled.
MYK
|
Don't be fooled?
Why would they be trying to fool you? What would they be trying to achieve?
The NYT page is an OPINION page, and says, "OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR" right at the top. Where is the conspiracy?
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
|