Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords
I’m already aware from all of our previous interactions that there’s zero point in responding with background on those two examples because you’ve never proven you’ve executed reading comprehension and it’s always been a massive waste of time so I’ll just have a huge laugh at the fact that you’ve missed the obvious subtext and points that were made in those. Way too high level for you at the second step of the ladder.
|
‘Obvious subtext’, in this case, would appear to mean ‘things I didn't say but expect you to assume that I said in order to make me look better’.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
‘You see in Calgary, [Ryan] Huska is no joke. It’s good. He’s really set on a specific model defensively. If you can be reliable, you have the freedom to play offence.’
—Ethan Wyttenbach
|