Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random
Calling someone a doormat for disagreeing with you is a classic example of what I’m talking about. All critical, no thinking.
If you actually had a valid argument, this would be a good place to present it. Instead you went straight to name-calling. I conclude that you have no argument.
As for your views being valid: I already know in advance that you will simply take the negative view of everything. If I can tell without even thinking about it what your opinion is going to be, I conclude that you didn’t bother putting any thought into it either. You’re as predictable as a stopped clock.
|
You can't tell what I'm thinking, you're not telepathic. You're not even smarter than me.
My argument is that Andersson could have done better by the Flames, despite insisting he did everything he could, without (fairly) acknowledging he is really only out for himself, as is his right. You could have engaged with that, instead of being a ####.