Chat GPT summary:
Raw distribution (grouped)
Very dissatisfied (1–4):
Votes: 25
Share: ~15%
Neutral (5):
Votes: 32
Share: ~20%
Satisfied (6–8):
Votes: 91
Share: ~56%
Very satisfied (9–10):
Votes: 15
Share: ~9%
Average score
Using the vote counts shown, the average rating is ~6.3 / 10.
1. Mild approval, not enthusiasm
An average just over 6 suggests fans are generally okay with the coaching, but far from thrilled. This is not a “home run” result — it’s more “acceptable, but not inspiring.”
2. The center of gravity is 5–8
Nearly three-quarters of voters landed between neutral and moderately satisfied (5–8). That tells you:
Most fans don’t think coaching is actively hurting the team
But few feel it’s clearly elevating them either
3. Strong polarization is absent
Only ~15% are clearly unhappy (1–4), and only ~9% are strongly positive (9–10).
That lack of extremes usually means:
Coaching is not the primary fan frustration
The fanbase sees coaching as competent but limited
4. “Extremely satisfied” is rare
Just 8 voters (4.9%) gave a 10. That’s telling — even supporters aren’t pounding the table for the coaching staff as elite or difference-making.
Big takeaway
Flames fans see the coaching as “fine,” not special.
It’s viewed as:
Stable
Generally acceptable
Unlikely to be the main reason for success or failure
|