Quote:
Originally Posted by JayP
The Wyttenbach quote really isn't the slam dunk you think it is.
He basically says if you're reliable defensively, then you have the freedom to be creative offensively. That also implies that if you're not reliable defensively, you aren't allowed that same freedom. Which is exactly what the article about Parekh is getting at. Coaching Parekh that way focuses only on his weaknesses but does nothing to continue nurturing his strengths.
Parekh has holes in his defensive game that obviously need to get addressed. But the idea of making him play a defensive shell game and limiting his offense until he proves he can play the "right way" is the exact opposite approach the Flames should be taking here. Parekh still needs to learn how to translate his offensive talent to the NHL - it's not just a given that he'll be able to figure it out once he spends 2-3 years focusing solely on his defense. Offensive freedom should be a priority either way.
|
Do you seriously think the Flames or Huska are asking Parekh to limit his offensive game?
Hockey is only half offense and a player that only plays an offensive game simply doesn't deserve nor will get the most ice-time possible. Having Parekh be a more defensively reliable player could mean the difference between having a 19 minute per night defenseman or a 24 minute per night one.
A player you can play in all situations and get more ice-time, you will also get more offensive opportunities. Telling him to just go out there are do what ever he wants is not beneficial to player or team.