Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
It is a decent return, but I think a lot of people are blindsided by the names and packages being thrown about in the speculation thread.
|
Yeah I think you look for the equivalence of two first rounders plus a bit more for a small retention.
1st is there.
2nd is there (I'll ignore the could be a first)
serviceable NHL defenseman likely worth a 2nd?
Prospect that I'd assume they like
Are we saying two 2nds and a prospect isn't worth a 1st?