Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebot
Don't be daft (otherwise why else would you make this post as soon as she hard pivots on her stance?).
…
If there was no issue, none of the timeline would have happened the way it has and she would stay onboard as an MP. A conflict is a conflict but it doesn't mean it's nefarious.
|
Because I made the post after I looked it up and that’s what it said. Not sure how that’s “daft” or why you’re angry and offended about a question.
Looking at the tweet, it also states she’s been in consultation with the ethics commissioner through the process. So if there is no issue, there is no issue, correct?
Why would she stay onboard as an MP when she already said she’d be resigning? There was never a timeline where she wasn’t going to resign.