Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey
That is because until the Canucks said it (and used the wrong tense, rebuild they are in implies that they have done other moves that were rebuilding type moves and this is their first) it had not been said. The Rangers did not use the word.
Now a GM has said it for the first time that I can recall in a statement. But I hear you, you think trading a 12th overall pick for 28 year old dman, trading a 4th round pick for a 34 year old, all moves the Canucks made this year are rebuilding trades for the rebuild.
|
You said rebuild is never said by any teams and guessed it was because of financial reasons. A couple weeks later you were proven dead wrong. Trying to explain or loophole your way out of this is only going to be a more embarrassing look.