Quote:
Originally Posted by TorqueDog
As long as that amendment doesn't open the door for claims that critique is persecution. You point out what the Quran or the Bible plainly says, and unfailingly, some idiot will shout 'IsLaMoPhObIa!!1!' or cry foul that 'Christians are being persecuted'. My concern is protecting the distinction between criticizing ideas and attacking people, and I wonder if that particular section of the code provides protection for that, because the way I'm reading it could theoretically cut both ways, no?
|
I went to a town hall where the Trinity Western was debating that they should be allowed to have an accredited, despite forcing all student to sign an oath stating they would only engage in sexual activity within the confines of a recognized heterosexual marriage. This was problematic, as non-hetero students would either be banned from entering or forced to lie, as their first act towards becoming a lawyer.
The universities main argument was that the Law Society was discriminating against their right to discriminate against non-hetero people. Long story short, the Law Society did not grant them accreditation.