Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
The Flames have been one of the least successful organizations under Edwards ownership when it comes to playoff success. Organizational failures that span decades are always indicative of poor ownership decision making. It's clear he's one of the worst owners in the NHL just as he was voted in that Athletic article as it's not a secret that he's a terrible owner. Everyone knows it, and as a fan it's a matter of dealing with it, and hoping that the organization can somehow have success in spite of him.
|
Not being successful would mean his hockey ops have not been good because that is who runs things. I give you that maybe he had a hand in the whole Sutter part deux stuff, but I also see the Flames are trying different things.
In regards to the athletic article, I think that is kind of my point. That article the ownership is penalized for not spending to the cap. Why would we want this team spending to the cap? In fact, if it were spending to the cap that would lend more credence to the retool rather than rebuild. Going back to back at the cap floor in a rebuild is how you rebuild. Fans that voted the ownership down for that I think are voting down without merit.