I suppose the only positive here is this was likely one interview broken into two parts.
In any case, DM calling Conroy's job good, while Huska's great, may have been simple speak but it certainly seems like DM is holding his hands close to his chest. One thing concerning to perhaps keep an eye on was their interest in Shanahan back in the day. Shanahan had a philosophy that once a rebuild was done they moved into another phase. In the process he fired Lamorillo and made Dubas the man. I hadn't heard of this philosophy before but if he pitched a similar thing to ownership and it stuck as an idea, perhaps they want Conroy for that foundational piece but don't have an interest in keeping him on beyond that? Just something that came to my mind. I'm pleased with Conroy's approach here. This is the year I'm actually optimistic for a change. Maloney's interview on behalf of ownership really is bothersome. I hope they don't actually believe what they're saying. Surely they can't be this daft.
|