@ Jay Random
The whole "we like our core" "run it back cause we almost snuck in" "going to be a tough out" is exactly the MO of this organization since 2006. The fact that they're way worse now doesn't change that continued organizational position.
I get that but also I'd love to have an organization with a little more intellectual honestly that could look at this group last year and decide that maybe a haul akin to the Carlo deal might be the better choice long term than a playoff race.
Certainly was for years before this.
You're evaluating outcomes not process, they also exposed Kuznetsov, can we agree that it was a flawed process that led them to exposing young players who could potentially make an impact in the lineup to protect AHL star Miromanov? Is that bad asset management or bad talent identification? Either way that's a problem with their process.
Well Zary looks like he's going to be in the starting lineup for Omsk in his next contract. Good amount of that is on him but still. I'm not going to relitigate the coaching issues, if you see no problems then sure but it sucks that a successful gameplan for this team now is turning the game into the worst hockey anybody has ever seen.
Sure? What's the problem?
Sure they're rebuilding I agree, but they're not doing everything they can to rebuild and that sucks, why should this fanbase accept more half measures? Why should we not expect more proactivity? Why should we be forced to give them the benefit of the doubt that they are indeed aware that this team isn't good enough and that we should disregard what their VP of Hockey Operations says? God it would be refreshing to hear it directly from them.
PS. Still figuring out quotes on this thing, my bad for the formatting.
|