Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
You don't, though. You've already said you don't. You just agree with their conclusion and are attempting to retroactively justify your initial position by reference to quotes from a news article about a Supreme Court decision you haven't even read. Those judges' argument is that the punishment is not grossly disproportionate in the circumstances. You specifically said that you think the opposite of that here:
|
Maybe you misread my post?
The dissenting judges, I agree with.
The made up, hypocritical scenario that doesn’t have any context or anything, is hard to say that the 18 year old deserves a year, but there is no real information on the made up scenario. If I wasn’t clear on that before, my mistake. I apologize.