Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
Why? To overrule a law for mandatory minimums? This doesn't give criminals any freedom, or shorter sentences, or anything like that. It just gives the decision back to judges, who still have other sentencing guidelines to follow. Essentially by supporting it you are saying you have no faith in our justice system to handle criminals on a case by case basis and that the law is so wrong it must be forced. The justice system must be broken, right? Is our country broken and needs Pierre to save it by overriding charter rights? I guess he must know better than the Supreme Court. Why not approach it from a different angle? To me this does not at all call for the notwithstanding clause, because the alternative isn't just letting child predators do whatever they want.
And if you try to call me a pedo for this post, you may as well just ban yourself, because I'll be reporting it immediately.
|
Gotta make sure we put the perps like this away for a long time!
Quote:
|
the young 18‑year‑old offender who, one day, keeps and views a file showing a 17‑year‑old victim that was sent to the offender without them having requested it
|
Yup that 18 year old, who was 17 yesterday and got a racy photo from his girlfriend for his birthday now deserves to go away for a very very long time. If conservatives don't understand nuance, then why should judges!
__________________
@PR_NHL
The @NHLFlames are the first team to feature four players each with 50+ points within their first 45 games of a season since the Penguins in 1995-96 (Ron Francis, Mario Lemieux, Jaromir Jagr, Tomas Sandstrom).
Fuzz - "He didn't speak to the media before the election, either."
|