Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David
We're receiving this info, 3rd-hand, 4th-hand or greater. Even if the info is true, it has gone through many people's own filter and have added whatever colouring to the information they perceive best resembles what they feel is the truth. People throwing around "toxic" may be correct but it isn't because they have direct knowledge of that.
|
That's what I'm talking about. My info usually has come through two filters before it gets to me. Unless it's just "this happened" (eg the truth about Andersson's scooter incident) it's usually X interpreting what Y said that player Z thinks.
There's a lot of that in this Andersson stuff. We hear "the room is divided because of this" and then a few posts later it seems like that's just a conclusion drawn from a number of different factors - the trade attempt, the UFA status, etc. Now it well may be true, but it's not like Zary said "I hate Andersson".