No offense to anyone, but this is exactly why I don't read newspapers. More and more of "news papers" have become columnists and editorials, areas in which facts mean nothing and rhetoric everything. To attempt to glean any information out of them is like trying to drain a dry sponge.
The Guardian is a total rag and apparently employs high school level writers. That said, HOZ, you're talking about a UK based paper referring to US involvement. They are going to be anti-American whether Clinton, Bush or Carrot-top is the current President.
Re-reading that last sentence... Anyone else think they forgot a line or two? Or perhaps a word:
Quote:
|
The report criticises the Bush administration's later approval of practices which would be illegal if carried out by British agents.
|
Seems like they forgot to put any context in. Again, poor level or writing, not an indication of conspiracy.