Quote:
Originally Posted by HOZ
sigh....
There was NO comparison.
The whole articles thesis is that Bin Laden could have been captured in 1998 but wasn't because MI6 got cold feet because the CIA wouldn't be nice to him. And then the article went on to blame Bush who wasn't in power at the time.
I am sure 3500 people feel much beter knowing MI6 played by the law and that in 1998 it was already Bush and Cheney's fault.
|
LOL
Get over your paranoia.
Here, go read the actual report. You'll see that neither the actual report nor the article on it are trying to pin anything on Bush or any other American for any events in '98 or '99 --
all they are talking about are British policies whereby they demand assurances that international laws will be followed.
The criticisms of Bush and his Administration's policies all involve post-9/11 activities.
It's a poorly written article, yes, but even more poorly read by someone hell-bent on finding crazy left wing conspirators under every rock.