Quote:
Originally Posted by Icantwhisper
Or... we are peppering goalies with even lower percentage chance shots than last year. And my original point was the shooting percentage is high from what we've see on the ice, half the goals have been flukes that took a strange bounce. Take those away and the our shooting percentage is even worse.
From a pure # of goals perspective, Coleman and Backlund have been good, nobody else is even meeting expectations.
|
What is more plausible?
That the same team, and the same coach, have suddenly decided to implement a far less effective, and less talented, form of offense?
Or that the team is having a dry spell (bad luck / cooler) and are due to revert to the mean (their more typical shooting percentage)?