Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
So when multiple players hit good offensive numbers under Huska, it's for reasons other than Huska. When their numbers drop it's because of Huska.
|
Or maybe average their production over his entire tenure to get an idea of how they have performed under his coaching the entire time. Maybe it's right on their career average, I've never thought of doing that. Could also normalize pointe production based in ice time broken down by even strength, PP, PK.
People are quick to defend Huska by either remembering a couple players hit career best goal totals in one year, or saying the team sucks and has no talent. I just posted a pretty reasonable explanation for why 3 players out of 46+ had one career goal year under Huska, which they have not or look like they won't repeat.
People who don't like how Huska has the team playing often give examples of what they don't like, but the only response they get is the team has no skill. Is it that weird to think there will be a response with some hockey context on a hockey site?