Quote:
Originally Posted by Cappy
Use this as a legal argument in a court and tell me how well it plays out. Sure, maybe you could make an argument of contributory negligence when you get sued for her injuries, but the reasoning behind these types of provisions is to prevent people from pulling the old Russian "lay down in the road and get hit for money" angle.
I just think it's funny that a 17 year old girl gets hit at a crosswalk and everyone is jumping on her for not paying attention - which we have absolutely no evidence of.
She wasn't paying attention because she was not looking at the car that just plowed into her? surely this is some of her fault and the man was in his right to get out an yell at her for contributing 50% to the accident....
|
Please respect the brave men standing up to criticize a teenage girl for having the childish negligence to get hit by car while in a crosswalk.
What do you think crosswalks are for, anyway? Crossing?
