Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven
Oh, I see. All of the conservative posters fled back to this thread instead of hashing out the public v. private school conversation in the strike thread.
The short answer to most of you guys is: - Funding private schools with public dollars is wrong - full stop - and harms the public system.
- Charter schools were a cool idea when they launched in 1994 but they failed to achieve the results and have basically become "private schools that get more money than the other private schools by pretending to be public".
- Both Private and Charter schools are leeches on the public system.
"There is only one pot of money for schools in Alberta. When money is diverted to private and charter schools, it leaves public schools in a funding shortfall."
When you have 1 system and all of the kids of the rich and powerful are put into that system along with everyone else, a funny thing happens: The rich people support the public system better and agree to invest more in supporting all kids instead of just their kids.
Most importantly, with that funding all going to one system, you can then design the system in more complex and advanced ways to enable tracks for different types of learning so that all kids are supported. That solves the problem that most of you cry about but does so in a way where no kid is left behind. This is better than your solution of a tiered education system, which is the ultimate form of trying to give more to one kid by taking away from many others. |
Despite the definitive tone you are taking, these are nothing more than your opinions.
The most rich and powerful will still get their private schools, middle class and upper middle class students will be hurt the most or kids with different learning needs or classroom structures.
Look at Ontario, you seeing a lot of equity in education out there?