Quote:
Originally Posted by iggy_oi
That may be how you interpreted it but that was not I was saying at all or how I intended for my post to be interpreted. I even stated that I could understand people’s relief in his messaging being stopped but I didn’t think cheering on outright murder as a mean to achieving that was something to be applauded. I don’t know how anything I wrote could be interpreted “scolding” anyone for not being sympathetic about him being dead but you’re welcome to explain how you came to that conclusion. If that was how you or anyone else interpreted it hopefully it’s clearer to you now.
Sincerely,
Someone who is likely at a much higher risk of being shot for sharing his political views than you but welcomes any opportunity to debate them.
|
LOL When all else fails, invoke the victim Olympics.
Piss off, Iggy; oppression isn't a debate coupon you can flash when cornered, and it doesn't magically launder a weak argument. I'm a half-Pakistani dude whose skin tone puts him on the wrong side of "…hmm, is
he deportable?" I would certainly be at a very real risk of being shot or shipped off to Venezuela if I set foot there, and it's thanks to the rhetoric of people like Kirk and his sհitbird ilk who make it possible. I still stop well short of anything approaching 'cheering'.
And for the millionth
bloody time, the vast majority here are not cheering. We simply reject the absurd notion that refusing to weep for the loss of a preacher of carnage is equivalent to endorsing his murder. That distinction matters, and it's mighty telling that your only response is to clutch your hypothetical bullet wounds in the face of discussing real ones.