Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
You say it is tragic, for others in society it's a relief he is no longer spreading hate towards them. You understand people can view things differently based on their own experiences, right? Are you saying there is not a person on Earth with young children who's death would not be tragic? Because a lot of kids grow up in homes where they'd be better off without a parent beating or sexually abusing them(lookup Fritzl if you want to muddy your moral waters). How do you know what the home life of these children would be with him around vs not? Maybe they would be better without him. You don't have the information to make that call one way or the other. Why do you get to decide how someone else's experiences shape how they feel about this event, and to judge them for it?
|
This is such a bizarre take that I suppose a response is pointless. Did you read what you just posted? I suppose we could call a panel of experts and decide how common is it to have your father murdered when you are between the ages of 1 and 4 and have that be a positive experience. How much information do you think is necessary to make this extremely difficult judgment call. I guess 3 years from now Charlie could have been carelessly backing out of his yard and run over one of his children and left them paralyzd. We can all rejoice he was shot and killed because that could have happened.