Quote:
Originally Posted by para transit fellow
I believe that using the city communication teams for election- related purposes is generally frowned upon
|
This was city money - she's not allowed to use it for campaigning.
Let's assume (somewhat charitably) that this is well intentioned public education not focused on getting her re-elected.
If that's the case, the City already has a communications department and she already has a city provided/funded website. If that department/website isn't capable of a pretty basic communications job then hopefully she is advocating that the city get rid of them to save money? If that isn't the case why does she need a 2nd website?