Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
Huska has historically been good-to-great at developing defencemen and I see no reason why that would change with Parekh. I think we’re all quite happy with the way prospects have developed under him so far, so I’m not sure citing “Flames things” is really relevant with this coaching group.
This isn’t Sutter or his predecessors post-Hartley.
|
After many years of hurt, I'm apprehensive. This is a prospect the Flames cannot afford to F-up. But yes, I see the new regime as doing a much better job so far.