[Fuzz]

Originally Posted by GGG

The project 2025 Tarriff goals actually made sense if you read through them. They wanted to end most favoured nation status and target countries that don’t provide reciprocal free trade.

So in the Canadian context this would mean Tarriffing flow through goods. Essentially the non-CUMSA goods but not energy or steal or copper or softwood. The 2025 economic plan wasn’t out to lunch.

Does that depend on which part of the document you read?

Project 2025 is split on the issue of foreign trade.[112] Mandate author Peter Navarro advocates what he calls a "fair trade" policy of reciprocal, higher tariffs on the European Union, China, and India, to achieve a balance of trade, though not all U.S. levies are lower than those of its major trading partners.[126] On the other hand, Mandate author Kent Lassman of the Competitive Enterprise Institute promotes a free trade policy of lowering or eliminating tariffs to cut costs for consumers, and calls for more free trade agreements.[126] He argues that Trump's and Biden's tariffs have undermined not just the American economy, but also the nation's international alliances.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025#Economy