[Bring_Back_Shantz]

Originally Posted by Firebot

Ok...enlighten on what has been done that you would mark as a positive Gondek✔ action where you would qualify her as an effective mayor based on those actions since she was elected?

Green Line fight against the province? ✔?

Water emergency? Would that get a ✔?

CESC? ✔ or no?

Downtown office conversion program? ✔

Rezoning. ✔?

We know of the actions listed because they are the ones she directly spoke on and made statements on (see her feed and webpage). They weren't obscure under the radar actions or statements.

There's going to be some positives or small wins to be found if you dig enough.

Does that make an effective mayor, or an effective leader? If someone has the time to create a comprehensive list of positives that you can attribute to Gondek, go right ahead. It's probably the best time to do so considering the election especially if someone is unhappy with the other candidate choices.

Make a case on why she should be reelected.

My point was that you made a dumb statement:
"Nearly everything she did was reactive political virtue signaling theatre meant for social media grandstanding."

Yet with relative ease you were able to list just as many things she did that were not "Political virtue signaling" or "Social media grandstanding".

I hate when people call something "Virtue Signaling" just because they don't agree with something, it's lazy and shows you don't actually want to discuss the policy.

You may not agree with her policy choices, or her votes on council (remember, she's just 1 vote), but she did a lot more than Grandstand and Virtue signal.