Quote:
Originally Posted by looooob
am assuming its for the voter to decide- but basically is the idea for best outcome/career (completed or ongoing) and not best pick given draft position? (Flames have oddly done better with later picks than early ones
I think I'm going with MacInnis- not only due to his Calgary tenure but I feel you can make the case his career may well be as good as any including Hull, but I'm a huge MacInnis booster
|
User name doesn't track.
But I agree with you. MacInnis and Hull are probably the best Flames drafts picks at their position in terms of sheer stats over their career.
You can make a case for the Makarov/Fleury/Gaudreau picks as far as impact versus draft position I guess.