Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug
That is what I am trying to debate.
They tried to make a stats based argument for worst contracts, but then added in a subjective layer so that they create a cap compliant team. It doesn't make sense.
|
This is what Down Goes Brown does. He tries to make lineups with weird restrictions.Things like, what's the best top line you can build from a team's history without repeating any initials (You couldn't include both Miikka Kiprusoff and Al MacInnis on the Flames line because of the shared M).
In this case he took the contract grades that another writer gave out and tried to get as many of the worst of them on the same cap compliant team. Two different authors, one doing stats, the other silly lineup games.