Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey-and_stuff
Well as you said, they tried to be cap compliant. You can debate why the bothered, but this is what they decided to do. They tried to make the worst possible value roster while also being under the salary cap.
Maybe they will do an all worst roster too, who knows.
Sent from my SM-S931W using Tapatalk
|
That is what I am trying to debate.
They tried to make a stats based argument for worst contracts, but then added in a subjective layer so that they create a cap compliant team. It doesn't make sense.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|