Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius
For a final destination, sure. But I think though there are airports people actively avoid for connections because of bad they are. LAX and JFK come to mind. Businesses inside these airports depend on the traffic. I don’t know if YYC is perceived poorly or at all or how much of a difference it would make, but people do take connecting airports into consideration when planning their flights. 6 hrs in LAX or 6 hrs in SFO, all else equal, where would you want to go?
|
Sure. But that's because LAX sucks, not because I don't like the "Los Angeles World Airports" branding.
Investing that money into literally anything that improves the passenger experience would be more useful. Put in a couple more water bottle fillers, buy another one of those ridiculous golf cart tram things so there's less waiting for folks who need it, whatever.