Quote:
Originally Posted by HighLifeMan
It's probably more common than you think.
Danielson for example had a very reminiscent D+0 and D+1 as a guy like Mark Scheifele.
1.22 pts/g vs 1.19 pts/g
He's a guy who I think projects quite safely as a 40 point middle six center with the potential for quite a bit more.
|
I agree with all of your posts on Danielson, HighLifeMan- thanks for holding the fort.
Different prospects develop at different rates, and in different ways. I love Danielson personally, and I have no doubt that he will be a solid NHLer for years to come. I think he has the talent to be a top-6 C in the show, but would it be so bad if he ended up being a 6’2” Backlund? There are plenty of ways to be a difference-maker. Just my opinion.