Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Yes, it's just a model. And a model is just numbers.
And a model can be flawed. Why is that difficult to accept?
|
It's am imperfect model. I think I've already conceded that point. It will never cover every variable because you can't accurately turn some variances like playoff performance into discrete data points.
I think we're agreeing with each other on everything except some of the vocabulary around the model, and maybe how people should interact with it.
For me, it's an interesting tool that has sparked some debate, which is fun !
Correct me if I'm wrong but you seem to think the model is worthless because it's missing down factors you find very important. Which is fine, but I'm just seeing things a different way.
Sent from my Pixel 7 Pro using Tapatalk