Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey-and_stuff
He never claims it includes postseason play and the data doesn't include any postseason data.
You have to take the data within the context that it's given. It's just numbers. It is just an approximation of value on regular season results vs factors like salary and term. It doesn't claim to be or need to be a comprehensive coverage of every single factor one can think of.
It is a model, not a declaration of facts.i don't know why people get so bent out of shape on something that the author never once claims to be the definitive answer with no room for interpretation.
Even this author raises concerns about his own model being too high or low on certain things all the time, from player projections to valuations of salary.
Sent from my Pixel 7 Pro using Tapatalk
|
Yes, it's just a model. And a model is just numbers.
And a model can be flawed. Why is that difficult to accept?