Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartcar
I followed this quite closely and I think the judge made the right decision. There is a lot of commentary based on media reports but the bottom line is EM was not credible, did consent at the time and likely was influenced by events afterwards (shame, anger at being dissed, etc). Also looking for a big payout. I thought blaming her civil lawyers for material errors in her statement of claim was BS. Who doesn’t read their statement of claim it’s an affidavit FFS.
Here is the full decision:
https://www.scribd.com/document/8929...ict#from_embed |
She couldn't be looking for a payout. She already resolved that matter with Hockey Canada. This was brought by the Crown.