Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
No offence but we’re talking about a multi-billion dollar business dealing with a multi-million dollar asset. Shouldn’t we assume they are entirely aware of the risks and rewards of how they’re managing said asset? Hoping they are suggests there’s a chance they aren’t, and I think we have to have a minimum level of confidence that they’re competent.
This is like the Kadri NMC thing, “they should ask! it doesn’t hurt to ask!” OK but they’re professionals actually doing the job many of us pretend to do for a few minutes a day on the internet (and in those few minutes we’re the best at it ever). I’m entirely confident they have all the basics covered that it’s not even worth considering. There are a lot of guys in that room who have done this for a long time.
Andersson will move when the deal makes sense. No point is making up our own deadlines and fretting about not hitting imaginary markers.
|
Not sure, when Tanev was traded, there was lots of discussion on this topic.
In that case, they never played him, the final couple of games
Media has also mentioned this with Andersson, (Fan960)
Risk management for sure, is there a risk. Absolutely,
(i.e. he was hurt last season)