I'll hope that the judge has a a stronger timeline of events, but buying your own drinks and walking fine at one point does not mean you are not plyed with drinks later.
IMO the big takeaway here is that the trial was 6 against 1, just as it was in the room. Of course 6 different defence lawyers are going to be able to expose some cracks in testimony compared to botched investigations 7 years ago.
Did the crown fail to produce experts on memory, sexual assault trauma, etc?
__________________
CP's 15th Most Annoying Poster! (who wasn't too cowardly to enter that super duper serious competition)
|