Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven
On the other hand, with Andersson they ignore that the Flames were gutted, especially on D and that the team essentially built a top 4 D out of two guys. Andersson was trying to cover the other team's best lines with a 24 year old 3rd line player with 148 games played and when Bahl went down the replacement was Bean or Hanley... but all of the chances against and goals against were on Andersson's side of the ice in a zone D system.
It just seems like the group of people on this board refuse to accept that Andersson is good, even on a bad year.
|
Weegar carried around a worse partner than Andersson did for most of the year. There are a few posters who think Andersson is worth a 2nd and 3rd but I think the minimum return is around Hanifin and the longer they wait the closer it will be to that.