Quote:
Originally Posted by Brupal
The point is to prevent lawsuits launched by someone like Richard Tornetta who holds nine shares which has delayed the awarding of a pay package for Elon Musk, despite two separate shareholder votes that supported it.
|
LOL. O' Lawdy...you really are hooked, aren't you?
The reason the pay package was delayed is because the board is made up of a bunch of Musk dick suckers, and didn't do their duty to shareholders, AS REQUIRED BY LAW. Unless you like to blame people for pointing out laws must be followed? Just because it's a cult, doesn't mean the cult members get to decide when laws are ignored.
And do you honestly believe changing the rules so only 3 external shareholders could exercise that is somehow just?
So the pay package denial by a court of law has led to Tesla trying to protect their board, because they are smarter than cultists, and recognize then done ####ed up, and have probably done ####ed up many times since the previous ones, and could(and should) be sued into oblivion for BREAKING LAWS. You should perhaps be asking why they are so determined to have the law changed, and then the next day exercise that change to protect their panties, if they've done nothing wrong.
But hey, the next time you get ####ed over by a corporation, and get told the best you get is to pound sand, maybe think back to the time you simped for the worlds richest man and then don't go bitching about how their should be a law to protect investors.
####ing simpletons are everywhere these days. Damn. No wonder everything is so ####ed.